Legal Opinion

James Talcott, Inc. v. Stagg Warehousing & Distributing Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1964Published

1Opinion of the CourtJacob Markowitz, J.

Plaintiff herein, a factor, sues defendant, a warehousing company, for refusing to deliver certain property which plaintiff claims it is entitled to pursuant to a duly filed factor’s lien on inventory to secure loans made to the Color Electronics Corporation (Personal Property Law, § 45). Defendant’s refusal is based on its assertion of a warehouse lien of $1,749.50, and the nonpayment of a $13,000 loan made by it to Color Electronics. A warehouseman’s lien, however, extends only to lawful charges and claims for storage and preservation of the goods, for advances of money, interest,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schwab v. OatmanNew York Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Schwab v. . OatmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API