Legal Opinion · Dissent

Access Capital, Inc. v. DeCicco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 31, 2002Published

1DissentRosenberger, J.

In granting and affirming summary judgment to plaintiff, the trial court and the majority rely on the defendant’s assertion of his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination in response to the allegations of the complaint and ignore the implications of what the majority characterizes as defendant’s “laundry list of affirmative defenses.” The plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment completely ignored the affirmative defenses. The motion court did not, in its oral decision, refer to them at all. On this ground alone, summary judgment was inappropriate.

Further, among those affirmative…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Marine Midland Bank v. John E. Russo Produce Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. United States v. Certain Real Property & Premises Known as: 4003-4005 5th Ave.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  4. Steinbrecher v. WapnickNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Britt v. International Bus Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API