Legal Opinion
United States v. Heid
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 11, 2011No. 10-3230PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRUENDER, Circuit Judge.
A federal grand jury returned a superseding indictment charging six defendants with conspiracy to launder money, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h). The proceedings relating to three of the defendants, including Tamara Heid, were severed from the remaining defendants, who also had been charged with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute methamphetamine. Heid pled guilty to the charge of conspiracy to launder money but later moved to withdraw her plea, arguing that no factual basis supported her guilty plea. The district court denied her…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Rene Ramirez-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Cuellar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. HynesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. SlaggCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Diaz-PellegaudCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. BuckCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Marquez LawhornCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- State v. KvasnickaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.