Legal Opinion

Swarts v. Purdy

Cincinnati Municipal Court

Decided September 25, 1964No. 819439PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKeefe, J.

The plaintiff has petitioned for damages for unworkmanlike efforts on the part of defendant who denies any liability and also filed a cross-petition with two canses of action. The first is not involved in this determination. The defendant alleges in his second canse of action that he has a valid and subsisting lien on the plaintiff’s residence and he prays that all liens on said real property be marshalled and that the plaintiff’s said premises be ordered sold by this court.

In answering the second cause of action of defendant’s cross-petition, plaintiff maintains that the Cincinnati Municipal…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Finley v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bowshier v. BowshierOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API