Legal Opinion

Lema Realty Corp. v. Najarian

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided April 11, 1946PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Per Curiam.

Plaintiff was entitled to relet the premises for the account of the tenant upon the latter’s abandonment thereof, pursuant to the provisions of the lease between them. But it was not authorized to grant the new tenants any concession at the expense of the abandoning tenant (Schwartz v. Brucato, 57 App. Div. 202). Accordingly, it was not entitled to rent for January and February, 1944, the period of the concession.

The judgment should be unanimously modified upon the law by reducing the amount of the recovery against defendant to $210, together with interest and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schwartz v. BrucatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Millison v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API