Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Ziegler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 13, 2006PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCardona, P.J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 4, 2004, which ruled that claimant’s benefit rate should be reduced to zero because he was receiving payments under a pension plan financed solely by his employer.

Claimant’s 24-year employment with Valeo Electrical Systems, Inc. ended in November 2003 after he left his employment pursuant to a “Retirement Acceleration Program” offered by the employer in order to effectuate a reduction in the work force.* The program is fully funded by the employer, does not include any funds from an established pension fund and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of FavoritoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. In re the Claim of BurdickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. In re the Claim of SherbellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. In re the Claim of WagnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of SanchezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API