Clement v. Minning
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtTJbneb, J.
The term “employment” is defined by the Workmen’s Compensation Law of Maryland to mean, only “a trade, business or occupation carried on by the employer for pecuniary gain.” Code, art. 101, sec. 65. The appellant was accidentally injured while working as a painter employed by the appellee on his residence then being constructed. At the trial of an appeal to the Baltimore City Court from the rejection by the State Industrial Accident Commission of the appellant’s claim for compensation, the evidence was held to be legally insufficient to prove that the appellee was conducting, as a trade,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Marsh v. GronerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- The Jewel Tea Co. v. WeberCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1918
- Todd v. Easton Furniture Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
- F. B. Beasman & Co. v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1918
- Taylor v. Robert Ramsay Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Keeney v. BeasmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
- Bethlehem-Fairfield Shipyard, Inc. v. RosenthalCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
- Montgomery County v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Barnes v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932
- Lynskey v. LindIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.