Legal Opinion
State v. Ehret
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 2, 2002No. F04666; A111249PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.
Defendant appeals from a conviction for possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(4)(a). In the trial court, he moved to suppress statements that he made to the police and the evidence seized from him and from his father’s car during a traffic stop. The trial court denied the motion, and defendant appeals. We affirm.
The facts regarding the stop of the vehicle in which defendant was a passenger are described in detail in State v. Ehret, 184 Or App 1, 55 P3d 512 (2002). In Ehret, we held that Officer Seber made a lawful traffic stop of defendant’s father’s (Albert’s) car, in which…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. Soto-NavarroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- State v. StearnsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- State v. ClemonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. RossCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. TovarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.