Legal Opinion

Whitehorn v. Arcanum

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1936No. 29724PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.

This is an action upon a fraternal benefit certificate, in which plaintiff is named as beneficiary. Defendant denied liability, alleging that plaintiff’s husband, who had been a member of the defendant order, had been suspended and had ceased to be a member for several months prior to his death. At the conclusion of all the evidence, the trial court, on motion of defendant, directed a verdict for it. Plaintiff has appealed.

The Royal Arcanum is a fraternál benefit association, organized under the laws of. Massachusetts, with its headquarters in Boston. The supreme governing body of the order…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. National Life Insurance v. GobleNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Ogden v. CampNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Van Dahl v. Sovereign Camp, Woodmen of the WorldNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Priest v. Business Men's Protective Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Chandler v. Royal HighlandersNebraska Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. ætna Life Ins. Co. v. KeplerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  2. Tighe v. Security National Life Insurance CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API