McShane v. Keiser

This appeal on questions of law comes directly from the Municipal Court, wherein the plaintiff • recovered a money judgment for one-half a real estate commission, claiming to have been a co-operating broker with the defendant.

There is no bill of exceptions. However, the trial court made separate findings of fact and conclusions of law, and the sole question before this court is as to the sufficiency of the findings to sustain the judgment.

As an appellate court, we are required to indulge a presumption of regularity and propriety to the judgment below, in the absence of error prejudicial to…