Legal Opinion

RICHARDSON v. PECO ENERGY

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 21, 2022No. 2:22-cv-03485Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ALEXIS APRIL RICHARDSON : CIVIL ACTION : v. : NO. 22-3485 : PECO ENERGY : : MEMORANDUM KEARNEY, J. October 21, 2022 Alexis April Richardson pro se sues her electric provider PECO Energy Company for violating the Truth in Lending Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, and the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law. We granted her leave to proceed without paying the filing fees and must screen her allegations before issuing summons. We dismissed Ms. Richardson’s Complaint and granted her leave…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kelley Mala v. Crown Bay MarinaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  2. Steven Vogt v. John WetzelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
  3. Casey Dooley v. John WetzelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  4. Hedges v. MuscoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  5. Allah v. SeiverlingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API