Legal Opinion
State v. Murphy
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided September 13, 2004PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClifford, J.
[¶ 1] Daniel Murphy appeals from his sentence entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Delahcmty, J.). Murphy contends that the court erred when it concluded that because he violated his bail conditions, his plea agreement, pursuant to which the State promised to recommend a specific sentence, became an open plea. We agree with Murphy and vacate his sentence.
I. BACKGROUND
[¶ 2] On February 7, 2003, Murphy pleaded guilty to one count of burglary (Class B), 17-A M.R.S.A. § 401(1) (1983), 1 and two counts of reckless conduct with a dangerous weapon (Class C), 17-A M.R.S.A. § 211(1)…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Jesus Antonio Partida-ParraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. James McQueenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Otis Mario JonesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- American Protection Insurance v. Acadia Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- United States v. Anthony Dwayne AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. RussoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- Lyman Morse Boatbuilding, Inc. v. Northern Assurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- State v. NewbertSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
- State v. TelfordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- State v. TelfordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010