Legal Opinion
Rodriguez v. Bagnola
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided June 30, 1998No. 1—96—1807, 1—97—0094 consPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tully
Matt Rodriguez, superintendent of police of the City of Chicago (Superintendent), filed administrative charges against James Bagnola (Bagnola) seeking to discharge Bagnola from his position as a Chicago police officer for knowingly possessing cocaine. Initially, on March 11, 1993, the Police Board of the City of Chicago (the Board) dismissed the charges and ordered that Bagnola be reinstated with back pay. The Superintendent brought a complaint for administrative review to the circuit court of Cook County, naming Bagnola and the Board as defendants. The circuit court vacated the Board’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Abrahamson v. Illinois Department of Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Harris v. Manor Healthcare Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
- First of America Trust Co. v. ArmsteadIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
- Launius v. BD. OF FIRE & POLICE COM'RS OF CITY OF DES PLAINESIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bagnola v. Smithkline Beecham Clinical LaboratoriesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- Fragakis v. SCHILLER PARK POLICE AND FIREAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Chicago Housing Authority v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Glaser v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
- Porter v. Cook County Sheriff's Merit BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.