Legal Opinion

United States v. Luce

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided September 26, 1905No. 155PublishedCited by 9 opinions

William Michael Byrne, late U. S. Atty., and John P. Nields, U. S. Atty.

1Opinion of the Court

BRADFORD, District Judge.

This suit is one of long standing and should have been disposed of several years ago. It has been elaborately and exhaustively argued by counsel in all its phases and has also been reargued on some points. It was brought by the United States against Edward Euce, James V. Euce and Edward C. Euce, trading as Euce Brothers, for the abatement or suppression of an alleged nuisance. The bill, as amended, prays in substance for an injunction restraining, the defendants from further prosecuting their business of manufacturing oil and fertilizers from fish at their factory on…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Fifth Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Camfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Campbell v. . SeamanNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  4. People v. Gold Run Ditch & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Chipman v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Reserve Mining Co. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  2. City of New York v. A-1 Jewelry & Pawn, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
  3. Bartel v. Ridgefield Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. City of New York v. A-1 Jewelry & Pawn, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
  5. Reserve Mining Company, a Minnesota Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency and William D. Ruckelshaus, Individually Andas Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, Reserve Mining Company v. United States of America, United States of America v. Reserve Mining Company, Reserve Mining Company v. United States of America, the State of Wisconsin v. Reserve Mining Company, Minnesota Environmental Law Institute, Inc. v. United States of America, the State of Michigan v. Reserve Mining CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API