Muggenborg v. Kessler
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice:
Two issues are presented in this proceeding: [1] Are the petitioners (maternal and paternal grandmothers of two minors whose parents are deceased) affected or interested parties who were entitled to notice of an adoption proceeding brought by the divorced maternal grandfather? [2] Will a prerogative writ lie to arrest judicial enforcement, by contempt, of an adoption proceeding found to be ineffective for want of advance notice to an affected or interested party? We answer both questions in the affirmative.
At the heart of the controversy before us is the adoption status of two…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Bomford v. Socony Mobil Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Parker v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Vallimont v. MedfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
- Application of AltmillerIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- DUTTON v. CITY OF MIDWEST CITYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- Christian Placement Service v. GordonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- In Re the Adoption of G.D.L.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- In the Interest of B.B.M.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- Jonas v. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.