Legal Opinion

Wagg-Anderson Woolen Co. v. Dunn

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court of Milwaukee county: E. 3ST. Austin, Judge. Replevin. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Cassoday, C. J.. It appears from, the record that January 30, 1894, one Einkelstein was indebted to the plaintiff ■on account of goods theretofore sold and delivered, and on that day executed and delivered to the plaintiff, on account of such'indebtedness, his judgment note for $325; that judgment was thereupon immediately entered, and execution issued, and Finkelstein’s stock of goods levied upon and taken into the possession of the sheriff; that Finkelstein thereupon protested, and the result was that January 31, 1894, Finkelstein gave to the plaintiff a bill of sale of his said stock of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Parroski v. GoldbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Ryan Drug Co. v. HvambsahlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Antigo Screen Door Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1903
  2. Dornbrook v. M. Rumely Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  3. In re H. G. Andrae Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API