Wagg-Anderson Woolen Co. v. Dunn
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court of Milwaukee county: E. 3ST. Austin, Judge. Replevin. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Cassoday, C. J.. It appears from, the record that January 30, 1894, one Einkelstein was indebted to the plaintiff ■on account of goods theretofore sold and delivered, and on that day executed and delivered to the plaintiff, on account of such'indebtedness, his judgment note for $325; that judgment was thereupon immediately entered, and execution issued, and Finkelstein’s stock of goods levied upon and taken into the possession of the sheriff; that Finkelstein thereupon protested, and the result was that January 31, 1894, Finkelstein gave to the plaintiff a bill of sale of his said stock of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Parroski v. GoldbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
- Ryan Drug Co. v. HvambsahlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Antigo Screen Door Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1903
- Dornbrook v. M. Rumely Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- In re H. G. Andrae Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1902