Legal Opinion

United States v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 27, 1914No. 1228PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond; Edmund Waddill, Judge. Action for a penalty by the United States against the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company. Judgment was rendered for defendant on a directed verdict, and the United States brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

PRITCHARD, Circuit Judge.

-This action was begun by the United States on August 6, 1912, to recover $200 from the defendant in error, the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, for violation of the Safety Appliance Act. The declaration contained two counts, the first count relating to a violation of the act in the use by the railway company of a New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad car, No. 75,653, while the same was in a defective condition, and the second count relating to a Southern Railway car, as to which there is no controversy on this writ of error. The jury, by direction of the court,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Pere Marquette R.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1913
  2. Erie R. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1912

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad v. EvansTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Rush v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  3. Pennsylvania Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
  4. United States v. Spokane International Ry. Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1928
  5. United States v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API