Legal Opinion

Appeal of Gude Bros., Kieffer Co.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided October 27, 1925No. Docket No. 3273PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1030OPINION.

James:

The taxpayer claims the allowance of a reserve for anticipated legal expenses. Eeserves are not allowable deductions from gross income, except where explicitly so provided by the statute. Appeal of William J. Ostheimer, 1 B. T. A. 18; Appeal of Consolidated Asphalt Co., 1 B. T. A. 79; Appeal of Uvalde Co., 1 B. T. A. 932; Appeal of Morrison-Ricker Mfg. Co., 2 B. T. A. 1008.

The taxpayer claims a deduction on account of certain concrete flooring and plumbing apparently put in its building during the taxable year. The petition contains allegations of fact which if true would seem…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bane v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
  2. Manistique Lumber & Supply Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
  3. Gude Bros., Kiefer Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API