Legal Opinion

Qi v. United States Citizenship & Immigration Services

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 17, 2024No. 1:23-cv-08843Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK GAO QI, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:23-cv-08843 (JLR) -against- OPINION AND ORDER UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al., Defendants. JENNIFER L. ROCHON, United States District Judge: Gao Qi (“Plaintiff”) filed an asylum application with United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) in 2020. ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”) at 5. Several years have passed, yet Plaintiff has “not receive[d] an appointment for [an] asylum interview.” Id. Seeking to expedite matters, Plaintiff has sued USCIS, USCIS’s Office of the General…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Chavis v. ChappiusCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  5. Telecommunications Research & Action Center v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API