Preferred Risk Insurance v. Gill
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentLocher, J.
I cannot agree that Preferred Risk has
stated a claim for which relief can be granted, and would hold that Preferred Risk was not entitled to bring this declaratory judgment action. Moreover, I am not persuaded that we should overrule Transamerica Ins. Co. v. Taylor (1986), 28 Ohio St. 3d 312, 28 OBR 381, 504 N.E. 2d 15, and State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Pildner (1974), 40 Ohio St. 2d 101, 69 O.O. 2d 509, 321 N.E. 2d 600. Both of these well-reasoned cases are still good law and should be upheld under the principle of stare decisis.
Transamerica, supra, and Pildner, supra, stand for the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Scott v. News-HeraldOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Motorists Mutual Insurance v. TrainorOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. PildnerOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- Hammontree v. HawleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.