Legal Opinion · Dissent

Preferred Risk Insurance v. Gill

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1987No. 86-882Published

1DissentLocher, J.

I cannot agree that Preferred Risk has

stated a claim for which relief can be granted, and would hold that Preferred Risk was not entitled to bring this declaratory judgment action. Moreover, I am not persuaded that we should overrule Transamerica Ins. Co. v. Taylor (1986), 28 Ohio St. 3d 312, 28 OBR 381, 504 N.E. 2d 15, and State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Pildner (1974), 40 Ohio St. 2d 101, 69 O.O. 2d 509, 321 N.E. 2d 600. Both of these well-reasoned cases are still good law and should be upheld under the principle of stare decisis.

Transamerica, supra, and Pildner, supra, stand for the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Scott v. News-HeraldOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Motorists Mutual Insurance v. TrainorOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
  4. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. PildnerOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Hammontree v. HawleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API