Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Liberty National Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 23, 1945No. 30707PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.

The defendant filed a general demurrer to the petition on the ground that it does not set out a cause of action against the defendant, in that, “in the first place, while it is alleged in the petition that ‘said policy is in full force and effect’ it is nowhere alleged that all premiums have been paid. The statement to the effect that the policy was ‘in full force and effect’ is a mere conclusion. In order for a policy to be in force and effect it is necessary that all premiums on the policy be paid, and an allegation to that effect is a necessary requisite.” This court, in National Life &…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hall v. General Accident Assurance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  2. Life Insurance Co. of Virginia v. ProctorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  3. Guaranty Life Insurance v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  4. National Life & Accident Insurance v. LockettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  5. Richards v. Travelers' InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Liberty National Life Insurance v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
  2. Sims v. Penn Mutual Life Ins. Co., PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API