Legal Opinion

de la Pole v. Lindley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1922No. 16712PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of tbe superior court for Columbia county, McCroskey, J., entered July 5, 1921, upon findings in favor of tbe defendants, in an action to contest tbe validity of a will, tried to tbe court.

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

— Clara A. E. Duncan, tbe person mentioned and referred to as tbe widow of John W. Duncan, in de la Pole v. Lindley, ante p. 387, 204 Pac. 12, and de la Pole v. Broughton, ante p. 395, 204 Pac. 15, to which cases reference is made for further facts throwing light upon tbe question here presented, died in California, November 26,1919, being then a resident *399of, and leaving an estate in, Columbia county, Washington.

Deceased left a last will, dated March 10, 1919, which was admitted to probate in the superior court for Columbia county on December 27, 1919, and thereafter appellant began a contest…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of UphamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. N.Y. Institution for the Blind v. . How's Ex'rs.New York Court of Appeals · 1854
  3. Hitchcock v. Board of Home MissionsIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Reformed Presbyterian Church of North America v. McMillanWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Wilson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re France's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Catholic Charities v. Sacred Heart VillaWashington Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API