Legal Opinion · Dissent
Yellow Manufacturing Credit Corp. v. Horowitz
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided February 14, 1938Published
1DissentHammer, J.
I dissent and vote for affirmance. The evidence warranted the court in accepting the version of plaintiff, a conditional vendor. The illegal seizure in New Jersey did not give defendants’ possession which can be made the basis of a lien. (Owl Wet Wash Laundry Co., Inc., v. Karish, 188 N. Y. Supp. 782; Smith v. Pierce Arrow Sales Corp., 224 App. Div. 769; Sterling Motor Truck Co. v. Lavan, 260 N. Y. 43.)
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Smith v. Pierce-Arrow Sales Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- Sterling Motor Truck Co. of N. Y., Inc. v. LavanNew York Court of Appeals · 1932