Legal Opinion
Celtig, LLC v. Patey
District Court, D. Utah
Decided June 4, 2018No. Case No. 2:17–cv–01086PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On September 26, 2017, Plaintiff Celtig, LLC filed a complaint against Defendants Aaron A. Patey; Evergreen Strategies, LLC; PSD International, LLC ("PSDI"); and Relay Advanced Materials, Inc. ("RAM") (collectively, "Defendants"). Celtig alleged that the court had subject matter jurisdiction based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). That section allows district courts to exercise original jurisdiction when the controversy is between citizens of different states and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.
Defendants have moved to dismiss based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction, arguing that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wisconsin Department of Corrections v. SchachtSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Carden v. Arkoma AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Grupo Dataflux v. Atlas Global Group, L. P.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Vlandis v. KlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Siloam Springs Hotel, L.L.C. v. Century Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- BL Ventures v. Apex Medical, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2021
- Storm River, LLC v. Jordan Foster Construction, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2024