North Point Consol. Irr. Co. v. Industrial Commission
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.
This is an application to this court by the plaintiff to review, set aside, and annul an award made by the Industrial Commission of Utah, hereinafter called Commission, in favor of one Steve Shingleton, who was an employé of the plaintiff.
Briefly the facts are that on the 21st day of August, 1922, said Shingleton was in the employ of the plaintiff. He, with *422some other employés of the plaintiff, bad, for a number of days, been engaged in repairing a certain dam wbicb plaintiff had constructed and which was a part, of its irrigation and distributing system. The dam in question was located some…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Claim of Kowalek v. New York Consolidated RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- De Constantin v. Public Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
- Ocean Acc. Etc. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1916
- Fumiciello's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Walker v. HydeIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1932
- Kahn Bros. Co. v. Ind. Comm. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1929
- Covey-Ballard Motor Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1924
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. LodesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.