Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Protest 800468-G of Foxboro Co.

United States Customs Court

Decided December 14, 1944No. 49868Published

1Concurrence

CONCUEEING OPINION

Tilson, Judge:

The motion to amend in this case raises the same point as was raised by the motion to amend in William Goodacre v. United States, 5 Cust. Ct. 82, C. D. 374, to the granting of which I filed a dissenting opinion. The reasons stated in that dissenting opinion are equally applicable to the motion to amend in this case, which I hereby adopt as my reasons for refusing to join in granting the motion to amend herein. However, since my associates have granted the motion to amend, and since the plaintiff has established its right to a refund under the amendment, I join…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. William Goodacre & Sons, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API