Legal Opinion
Condo v. Conners
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided May 27, 2010No. 09CA1130PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge BERNARD.
Plaintiff, Elizabeth Condo (the assignee), appeals the trial court's summary judgment for defendants, Thomas J. Conners and George Roberts (collectively the partners), and Wendell Porterfield (the attorney), on her claims of tortious interference and civil conspiracy. We affirm.
I. Background
The assignee is the former wife of Thomas Banner (the assignor), who was formerly a member of Hut at Avon, LLC (the LLC). The partners were the other members of the LLC, and the LLC was represented by the attorney.
As part of a divorcee settlement, the assign- or agreed to assign to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bel-Ray Company, Inc. v. Chemrite (Pty) Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Copper Mountain, Inc. v. Industrial Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2009
- City & County of Denver v. District Court Ex Rel. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Civil Service Commission v. PinderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Travertine Corp. v. Lexington-SilverwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Condo v. ConnersSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- Broadband, Inc. v. Banning Lewis Ranch Metropolitan District No. 1Colorado Court of Appeals · 2018
- Autotech Technologies, LP v. Palmer Drives Controls and Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2020