Legal Opinion

Carson v. Thompson

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1974PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph A. Brtjst, J.

Plaintiffs move for a temporary injunction and defendants Thompson, McCoy and Tyson cross-move for summary judgment. The cross motion is granted and the motion is denied.

*873Plaintiffs seek for themselves, and for members of a class, judgment declaring the provisions of section 110 of the New York City Civil Court Act creating a Housing Part in the Civil Court of the City of New York to be unconstitutional and the motion-in-chief seeks to restrain the cross-moving defendants from permitting trials in special proceedings to recover real property before hearing officers in the newly created Housing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ryan v. Atlantic Mutual Ins.New York Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Glass v. ThompsonNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Ryan v. . Atlantic Mutual Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1876

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Glass v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. Carson v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API