Legal Opinion

United States v. Russell & Tucker

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 22, 1938No. 8445PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

In 1918 and 1922 the United States through the Bureau of Animal Industry were, by way of regulating interstate commerce, prohibiting the movement of cattle from fever tick infested points in Texas to other states, unless inspected and treated as required by regulations. Texas cattle carrying ticks were themselves immune to the splenetic fever caused or transmitted by the bite of ticks, but nonimmune cattle in tick free territory to.whom ticks were imparted would within 30 days contract fever and many would die. The pastures in which ticky cattle run become infested with…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Pike v. . HonsingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. San Juan Light & Transit Co. v. RequenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kuhnert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  2. United States v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  3. Russell & Tucker v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1940
  4. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API