Legal Opinion
Kardas v. Board of Selectmen
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided July 31, 1979PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.
The issue to be resolved in this case is the proper rate of compensation for the plaintiff, the chief of police of Dedham. Under G. L. c. 48, § 57G (the ratio act),2 the plaintiff is entitled to receive an "annual base rate of compensation” not less than twice "the highest annual rate of compensation” of a full-time police officer or patrolman. Specifically, we must decide the basic question whether career incentive pay, authorized under G. L. c. 41, § 108L (the career incentive pay act),3 is to be includ*186ed in addition to a patrolman’s base salary in determining "the highest annual rate of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hoffman v. Howmedica, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- O'CONNOR v. City Manager of MedfordMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Cohen v. PriceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Colt v. FradkinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- Labor Relations Commission v. Town of NatickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bowers v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- Patry v. Harmony Homes, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
- Gill v. North Shore Radiological Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
- Bd. of Selectmen v. MUN. COURT, CITY OF BOSTONMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
- Bleicken v. StarkMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.