Legal Opinion
State v. Miller
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided December 20, 1995No. 94-1576PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDREASEN, Justice.
Albert C. Miller appeals from his convictions for practicing medicine without a license. He urges that he did not knowingly and intelligently waive his Sixth Amendment right to counsel, and that the record contains insufficient evidence to support his convictions. We affirm the judgment of the district court.
I. Background, Facts and Proceedings.
Miller was charged by a trial information with seven counts of practicing medicine without a license. Counts I through VI involved violations of sections 147.2 and 147.103A(1) of the Iowa Code, 1991 (as amended). Count VII involved a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Patterson v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- State v. LigginsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- State v. HutchisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. LigginsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- The Judge Rotenberg Educational Center, Inc. v. FDACourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
- Rodrigo Adolpho Amaya v. State Public DefenderSupreme Court of Iowa · 2022
- Rodrigo Adolpho Amaya v. State Public DefenderSupreme Court of Iowa · 2022
- Rodrigo Adolpho Amaya v. State Public DefenderSupreme Court of Iowa · 2022