Legal Opinion

Stump v. Harvey

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 3, 1936No. 13400PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNKLIN, Chief Justice.

E. J. Stump, defendant in the court below, has appealed from a judgment in favor of E. C. Harvey and J. T. Young, composing the partnership firm of Harvey & Young, plaintiffs, for the sum of $1,-200 as damages for alleged breach of defendant’s contract to drill an oil well on a lease owned by plaintiffs.

The contract made the basis of the judgment was dated October 1', 1934, and was executed by both parties to this suit. It stipulated that defendant would drill an oil well on a lease owned by plaintiffs to a depth of 3,600 feet, and in considera-tipn therefor plaintiffs…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coates v. CaldwellTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Sanitary Appliance Co. v. FrenchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. B. F. Avery & Sons v. StewartTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Ferguson v. Plainview Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Zachry v. Robertson Dba.Texas Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Harvey v. Wichita Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API