Black River Associates v. Newman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Denman, P. J.
In this action by plaintiff seeking specific performance of an agreement by defendant, a nondomiciliary, to purchase real property located in New York, we are called upon to decide whether, by entering into such agreement, defendant "transacted] any business” in New York (CPLR 302 [a] [1]), thus subjecting himself to the exercise of "long-arm” personal jurisdiction by a New York court. We conclude that defendant thereby transacted business in New York and thus is subject to suit in New York in a manner consistent with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Symenow v. State Street Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Salamon v. FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. v. McDonnellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Atwal v. AtwalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Plummer v. Massullo, No. 560598 (May 2, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.