Legal Opinion

Meece v. Moerbe

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1982No. C-919PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Justice.

This is an appeal of a bill of review proceeding. The only question is whether article 5069-1.06(2) 1 authorizes an award of attorneys’ fees to the bill of review defendant, Frank Meece. We hold Meece is entitled to his attorneys’ fees.

Bob Moerbe, d/b/a Bob’s Air Conditioning, originally filed suit against Meece alleging an unpaid balance on charges for repairing an air conditioning system. Meece counterclaimed alleging the U/2% per month interest charge for late payment assessed by Moerbe was usurious. The jury found for Moerbe on all issues. However, the trial court held…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baker v. GoldsmithTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. International Security Life Insurance Co. v. SprayTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Moerbe v. MeeceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wynne v. Adcock Pipe and Supply, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1988
  2. Perry v. Breland, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2000
  3. Xiaodong Li v. DDX Group Investment, LLC D/B/A Dong Ting Chinese Restaurant, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
  4. Hydra-Rig, Inc. v. ETF CORP.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. National Union Fire Insurance Co. v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API