Miliner v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Appellant pleaded guilty to robbery in the third degree and unlawful possession of controlled substances. He was sentenced to twelve years in each case, with the sentences to be served concurrently.
The record reveals that the trial judge explained to the appellant his privilege against self-incrimination, his right to a trial by jury, his right to confront his accusers, the nature of the charges, and the acts sufficient to constitute the offenses, according to the requirements of Boykin v.Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969).
However, an accused must also be informed of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
- Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
3Cited by27 opinions
- Faircloth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- Coulter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- Ex Parte WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Jones v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.