Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Parks v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 12, 1990No. CR 89-180Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRobert H. Dudley, Justice

I wholly concur with that part of the majority opinion which denies relief on the plea of guilty for aggravated robbery. However, I dissent from that part which denies relief from the plea of guilty for theft of property having a value of $2,500.00 or more. I would order the trial court to set aside the guilty plea and give the appellant a trial on the charge of theft of property having a value of $2,500.00 or more. The reason is simple: a trial court “shall not enter a judgment upon a plea of guilty or nolo contendere without making such inquiry as will establish a factual basis for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Furr v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Knee v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API