Legal Opinion

Becker v. Shaw

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 12, 1904PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Complaint. Before Judge Calhoun. City court of Atlanta. December 16, 1903.

1Opinion of the CourtKish, P. J.

1. Where a party voluntarily testified that he acted in a given transaction under (he advice of his attorney, it was not cause for a new trial that his attorney was permitted, over his objection, to testify to the same thing.

2. Although the evidence demanded a verdict for the plaintiff, the court erred in directing a verdict for the amounts of principal, interest, and attorney’s fees as therein stated. The Civil Code, §2883, prescribes that, “When a payment is made upon any debt, it shall be applied first to the discharge of interest due at the time, and the balance, if any, to the reduction…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Augusta Railway & Electric Co. v. BeaglesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  2. Nash v. BurtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API