Legal Opinion

Fritzner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 30, 2004No. 5D03-4067PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, W., J.

Fritzner appeals from the trial court’s summary denial of his amended motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm because Fritzner failed to affirmatively allege that his claim of an illegal sentence can be determined from the face of the record. See McKowen v. State, 816 So.2d 1254 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). However, as in McKowen, our affirmance is without prejudice to Fritzner to file á facially sufficient motion pursuant to rule 3.800(a).

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, C.J., and PLEUS, J., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McKowen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  2. Hankerson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  3. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010