Legal Opinion

GHANEY v. Heinauer

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided March 4, 2008No. 07-0498-CV-W-ODSPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND OPINION GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ORTRIE D. SMITH, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Ahmed Mohamed Hazem Abd El Ghaney’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 14) filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Procedure 56 (“Rule 56”). Plaintiff asks the Court to either set a hearing to review his naturalization application de novo or to remand the case to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“US-CIS”) with appropriate instructions as provided by the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. § 1447(b).

For the following reasons, Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Get Away Club, Inc. v. Vic Coleman, Jim SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. HovsepianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. Howard Perry, Glen Hagen, James Geran, Kevin Dorr. United States of America v. Howard Perry and Gary MooreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API