People v. Ruhl
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, J.
In People v. Arbuckle (1978) 22 Cal.3d 749 [150 Cal.Rptr. 778, 587 P.2d 220, 3 A.L.R.4th 1171], our Supreme Court held, as a general *313principle, whenever a judge accepts a plea bargain and retains sentencing discretion under the agreement, an implied term of the bargain is that sentence will be imposed by that judge. (Pp. 756-757; see also In re Mark L. (1983) 34 Cal.3d 171, 177 [193 Cal.Rptr. 165, 666 P.2d 22].) In People v. Rosaia (1984) 157 Cal.App.3d 832 [203 Cal.Rptr. 856], the Fifth District Court of Appeal adopted a rule requiring that where a defendant has a right under…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- People v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. KaaneheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. BelmontesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. ArbuckleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. RuhlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985