State v. Elliot
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Johnson. Tried below before the Hon. Charles ■ So ward.
1Opinion of the CourtOgden, J.
The indictment.charges that the defendant did, on or about the first day of August, A.. D. 186.9, take up and use a certain stray horse. On the trial the district attorney moved to strike out the words “ or about ” before the first day of August,” and to insert-instead the words, “ to-wit,” which motion, was overruled by the court, to which ruling the district attorney excepted. The defendant then excepted to the sufficiency of the indictment, because it did not change the offense to have been committed at any certain time. The court sustained the exceptions and quashed the. indictment, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. LittlefieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
- People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
- Hardebeck v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
3Cited by16 opinions
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- State v. ThompsonMontana Supreme Court · 1891
- Morgan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
- State v. HarpSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
- State v. CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.