Legal Opinion
Crescent Estates Water Co. v. Public Service Commission
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 1, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMikoll, J.
Questions posed on this appeal involve (1) whether Supreme Court properly held that respondent has subject matter jurisdiction over an agreement made between petitioner Crescent Estates Water Company, Inc. (hereinafter Crescent), a privately owned, waterworks corporation, and petitioner Hollander Homes, Inc. (hereinafter Hollander), a developer of a new 67-unit townhouse subdivision known as Woodcrest Pointe (hereinafter Woodcrest), to supply water to Woodcrest which is outside Crescent’s service territory, (2) whether Supreme Court properly upheld respondent’s ruling that Crescent must first…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re Charles A. Field Delivery Service, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- New York Telephone Co. v. Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Cabrini Medical Center v. AxelrodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- National Fuel Gas Distribution Corp. v. Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- New York City Transit Authority v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- Crescent Estates Water Co. v. Public Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Catskill Center for Conservation & Development, Inc. v. JorlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Crescent Estates Water Co. v. Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Crescent Estates Water Co. v. Public Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1991