Legal Opinion
State v. Crisantos (Arriagas)
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided May 6, 1986Published
1Opinion of the Court
102 N.J. 265 (1986)
508 A.2d 167
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
JUAN RAMOS CRISANTOS, A/K/A JUAN CRISANTOS RAMOS, A/K/A FLORENTINO ARRIAGAS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued October 22, 1985.
Decided May 6, 1986.
Lowell Espey, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for appellant (Thomas S. Smith, Jr., Acting Public Defender, attorney).
Steven E. Braun, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Joseph A. Falcone, Passaic County Prosecutor, attorney).
The opinion of the Court was delivered by STEIN, J.
Appellant was indicted for the murder and robbery…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited40 opinions
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.