Legal Opinion

Matthews v. City of Atlantic City

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 19, 1984PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRUCCIO, A.J.S.C.

This action seeks to compel the defendants to authorize the payment of legal expenses incurred by plaintiff in his successful defense of an election contest. Both parties have filed motions for summary judgment on the issue of whether the City of Atlantic City must pay the legal expenses of plaintiff.

Plaintiff is the former mayor of Atlantic City, New Jersey and was serving in that capacity when the election contest was filed. The contest consisted of three separate suits, which were consolidated for trial. The first suit alleged malconduct, fraud, mismanagement, and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. GreenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  3. Borough of Matawan v. Monmouth County Board of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
  4. Roe v. KervickSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  5. Van Horn v. City of TrentonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McCurrie v. Town of KearnySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  2. Matthews v. City of Atlantic CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  3. State Ex Rel. Hicks v. BaileyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2011
  4. McCurrie v. Town of KearnyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
  5. New Jersey Election Law Enforcement Commission v. Citizens to Make Mayor-Council Government WorkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API