Legal Opinion

Acker v. Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 10, 1987Published

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: The affidavits, depositions and other material submitted by the parties on defendant’s motion for summary judgment reveal elements of employment supporting both general employment and special employment for purposes of the Workers’ Compensation Law. Under these circumstances, the issue of special employment is a factual one which must be resolved by the trier of fact (see, Matter of Vinciguerra v Carvel Corp., 127 AD2d 915; Brooks v Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, 71 AD2d 405).

The court did not abuse its discretion by permitting amendment of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCaskey, Davies & Associates, Inc. v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Brooks v. Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  3. Claim of Vinciguerra v. Carvel Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API