Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Sullivan

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 6, 2000No. 4D00-262PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm under the principles of Apple-gate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979) because the record does not contain the transcript of the trial court’s proceedings. Although we are cognizant of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(f)(2), the appellee in his answer brief specifically pointed out that the transcript was not contained in the record. “Where, as here, the appellees point out the deficiency in the record in their brief and appellants do not move to supplement the record, this court takes the position that compliance with rule 9.200(f)(2) has been…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of TallahasseeSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  2. Cirillo v. DavisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. PT Capital Invs., LLC v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  2. PT Capital Invs., LLC v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API