Legal Opinion
Saacks v. Target Corp.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 25, 2011No. 10-CA-819PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JUDE G. GRAVOIS, Judge.
|2The defendant has appealed a default judgment that has been rendered in favor of the plaintiff. For the reasons that follow, we vacate the judgment and remand for further proceedings.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On March 27, 2009, plaintiff, Kim Saacks, filed a Petition for Damages naming Target Corporation d/b/a Target Store T-1449 (“Target”), and appellant herein, Richards Clearview, LLC d/b/a Clearview Shopping Center (“Richards”), as defendants. In her petition, plaintiff alleged that she was injured when she slipped and fell while shopping in the Target store,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Power Marketing Direct, Inc. v. FosterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
- White v. Esplanade Properties Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
- Greenwood v. PellissierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
- Ables v. AndersonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ramos v. AlexanderLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Keller Supply, LLC v. ZeiglerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- Ramos v. AlexanderLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018