Pleasant View Farms, Inc. v. Ness
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SABERS, Justice.
Pleasant View Farms (Pleasant View) claims the trial court erred when it concluded that LeRoy Ness had sufficient rights in twenty-five calves to allow the security interest of Farmers Home Administration (FmHA) to attach thereto.
Facts
In the fall of 1985, Darold Tomsheck, an officer of Pleasant View, reached an agreement with Ness whereby Ness would provide the care and feeding of certain livestock belonging to Pleasant View * in exchange for the entire 1986 calf crop. Although no written contract was ever executed by the parties, the trial court found that the oral agreement…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In the Matter of Pubs, Inc. Of Champaign, Bankrupt. Appeal of Bank of Illinois in Champaign, ReclamationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Ray Rohweder v. Aberdeen Production Credit AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- First Nat. Bank in Pierre, SD v. FeeneySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
3Cited by13 opinions
- First National Bank of Philip v. TempleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- American Bank & Trust v. ShaullSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- First National Bank of Omaha v. Pleasant Hollow Farm, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Moore Equipment Company v. HalfertyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Continental Grain Co. v. BrandenburgSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.