Power v. Loonam
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPaul J. Widlitz, J.
Motion to vacate the restraining notice heretofore served on the judgment debtor’s employer is granted.
A subpoena to examine the employer was served on or after February 17, 1965. The subpoena contained a restraining notice in the language of CPLR 5222 (subd. [b]).' The employer has informed the judgment debtor that 10% of his earnings were being withheld on account of the restraining notice.
CPLR 5205 excludes from the satisfaction of a money judgment 90% of the earnings of a judgment debtor for personal services “ except such part as a court determines to be unnecessary for the reasonable…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Sequa Capital Corp. v. NaveDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Silbert v. SilbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Scheer v. City of SyracuseNew York Supreme Court · 1967