Bratton v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
A statement of the facts as to the theft is not necessary. Ho additional statement is required to illustrate the matter discussed in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HURT, Presiding Judge.
This is a conviction for the theft of a horse, the property of M. C. McCoy.
There was no error in refusing to continue the case for the testimony of Melvin Davis and Frank Lee. By these witnesses, appellant swears that he could prove that he purchased the horse from Ed Slickeison. This trial was had on the 21st day of January, 1895. On the 9th day of said month appellant, in his application for attachments, swore that he could prove by Ed Slickeison and J. O. B. Smith that he bought the horse from a Mexican named Juan Garza. Ed Slickeison and Smith were present, but were…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Bernard's, Inc. v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- State v. VelsirWyoming Supreme Court · 1945
- Perry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Glasser v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Smiley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.